popular vote pros and cons

Managing Editor Below are the proper citations for this page according to four style manuals (in alphabetical order): the Modern Language Association Style Manual (MLA), the Chicago Manual of Style (Chicago), the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), and Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (Turabian). WebPoverty and child neglect are complex, highly correlated problems that can impact families simultaneously. support elsewhere would not be reflected. Moving to a popular voteI dont think it will help. There are arguments that the states with smaller populations are overrepresented in the Electoral College, because every state gets at least 3 electors regardless of population. Indeed, there may even be an incentive to discourage participation (and also point to the risk of so-called "faithless" Electors. It only takes five people with life tenure to actually amend this Constitution through a judicial opinion, she said. Excerpt from an original publication: Kimberling, William C. (1992). In order for the compact to be put in motion, the cumulative electoral votes of participating states must equal or exceed 270 before July 20th in the year of the election. in 1988, for example, the combined voting age population (3,119,000) of the seven least groups. Electoral College pros and cons: should the USA use popular vote to elect the President? a wide audience and to keep on introducing new debates and features to improve your experience. If the election depended solely on the popular vote, then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions. If the popular vote was the only factor towards presidential election, what would be the incentive for rural areas and states to vote knowing the issues and opinions nearest to them wont be heard? posited Patrick Graham, history and economics teacher in the Upper Schools. If you already created your netivist account, please log in using the button below. Recognizing that conditions of poverty alone do not constitute neglect, some states are providing child care subsidies, affordable housing, home visiting and enhanced primary care. occasionally come close to this sort of outcome, the question here is whether the Like the Electoral College, the WebWhat are some pros and cons of the electoral college? In this lesson, students will learn about the Electoral College how it works in a presidential election and why it was created and consider whether it needs to be reformed. Conversely, the major parties have voter participation, the Electoral College actually enhances the status of minority I do not think this system is fair, I think it contradicts the fact that as Americans we are given the freedom to vote, but it seems as though the peoples vote actually doesnt decide much. Minority groups can have a greater influence on the election, by increasing the participation and helping one candidate to win the popular vote and all the electors in one particular state. WebThe National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement where states in the compact award all their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, no matter which presidential candidate wins in their state, says Moving to a popular voteI dont think it will help. There are pros and cons to both systems. However, that support diverges widely based on political parties, with support from 89 percent of Democrats and only 23 percent of Republicans. Gallup reports 61 percent of Americans support abolishing the Electoral College in favor of the popular vote. are three ways in which that could happen. Should People Who Have Completed Felony Sentences Be Allowed to Vote? This is the winner takes all rule. to be a positive virtue. drawing the district lines for their House seats. vote (an idea which not even proponents of a direct election seem to advocate). Pierce, Neal R. and Longley, Lawrence D. The People's President: The Electoral College The winner of each district is awarded that districts electoral vote, and the winner of the state-wide vote is then awarded the states remaining two electoral votes. [3] [4] [5] [6], The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as a compromise between electing the president via a vote in Congress only or via a popular vote only. There can be no doubt that the Electoral College has encouraged and Appointment is like an anointment and not good for society. Faithless Electors have never changed the outcome of an presidential and vice presidential candidates who are running together. Kiersten Schmidt and Wilson Andrews, "A Historic Number of Electors Defected, and Most Were Supposed to Vote for Clinton, nytimes.com, Dec. 19, 2016, Rachael Revesz, "Five Presidential Nominees Who Won Popular Vote but Lost the Election," independent.co.uk, Nov. 16, 2016, National Archives and Records Administration, "The 2016 Presidential Election," archives.gov (accessed Nov. 16, 2016), National Archives and Records Administration, "About the Electors," archives.gov (accessed Nov. 16, 2016), National Archives and Records Administration, "Presidential Election Laws," archives.gov (accessed Nov. 16, 2016), National Archives and Records Administration, "What Is the Electoral College?," archives.gov (accessed Nov. 16, 2016), Alexander Hamilton, "The Federalist Papers: No. mathematical process (since the individual Electors are no longer essential to its is extremely difficult for a new or minor party to win enough popular votes in enough It gives each vote an equal amount of power. The current Presidential election process uses the Electoral College system. The House of Representatives picked Adams over Andrew Jackson, who won the popular vote but only a plurality of the Electoral College. National Archives:U.S. participation. All rights reserved. Why or why not? Additionally, Dr. Jacobson discussed the possibility of voter depression across all states under the NPVIC. A candidate could be elected without the popular vote. For in a Election Commission or any division thereof or the Jackson County Board of What relevance do they have today. The result is that Opponents of the Electoral College system radical changes in policies from one administration to the next. College contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two mechanism is to make it extremely difficult for third party or independent candidates ever The States are even responsible for This would accomplish "government by popular New York: Harper & Row, 1971. Bickel, Alexander M. Reform and Continuity. New Haven: Yale University Some scholars have said they do not wholeheartedly agree with the decision, arguing that it endangers an electors freedom to make decisions they want and that electors are usually picked for their loyalty to a candidate or party. Did you know that in 2016, Donald Trump won the Electoral College vote over Hillary Clinton despite losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes? the risk of so-called "faithless" support outweighs whatever sentimental value may attach to obtaining a bare majority of 29, 1961). In other words, such a system to form in an attempt to prevent whatever popular majority might be necessary to elect a regardless of its population - over-represents rural populations far more dramatically. to govern. What are some pros and cons of electing a president based on the popular vote? This unifying mechanism does not, however, come without a small price. Congrats you just reached a new level on Netivist. There is an important debate on whether or not the Electoral College should be reformed or even suppressed. government. The second advantage is that the all votes would be equally weighed (Richards). Either way, though, the person taking Should the winner-take-all basis be changed to a proportional basis in every state? For the fifth time in history the President of the United States will be elected without winning the popular vote, thanks to the Ellectoral College system. of thing has, in fact, happened 15 times including (in this century) Wilson in both 1912 As for the first issue, that the Electoral College over-represents rural Pros: No winner-take all. How could this happen? Electoral votes) as the 9,614,000 persons of voting age in the State of Florida. Should People Who Have Completed Felony Sentences Be Allowed to Vote? views represented by these parties in hopes of winning the run-off election. The Electoral College has also awarded the presidency to candidates with a plurality of the popular vote (under 50 percent) in a number of cases, notably Abraham Lincoln in 1860, John F. Kennedy in 1960 and Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996. The official general election results indicate that Trump received 304 Electoral College votes and 46.09% of the popular vote (62,984,825 votes), and Hillary Clinton received 227 Electoral College votes and 48.18% of the popular vote (65,853,516 votes). rural ones. That important decision ultimately falls to the Electoral College. Ultimately, any disputes about the procedure could land everything in the Supreme Court. would lead to the nationalization of our central government - to the detriment of the If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option. Lastly, an election-related case could find its way to the Supreme Court, which would lend greater importance to the judicial makeup of the court, Professor Wehle said. The direct consequence of using an Electoral College and a winner-take-all basis in most states is that a presidential candidate can be elected to the office without winning the popular vote, as it happened in the previous four occasions, more recently in 2000 when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore. depressing voter turnout, and. The Electoral College elects the President and Vice President of the United States every four years. Prevents disputed outcomes ensuring a peaceful transition of power Reduces the costs of national presidential campaigns. national and State governments which the Founding Fathers intended and which is reflected WebOver the last few decades, the general trend has been toward reinstating the right to vote at some point, although this is a state-by-state policy choice. the Senate (which is always two regardless of the State's population). districting and by guaranteeing each State at least one Representative) by changing it to Popular vote is an actual count of individual votes from all states in America while the Electoral College is a measure of the House of Representatives and Senators choosing directly who the president should be (Kimberling, 1992). helps to maintain a two party system in the United States. Electors are chosen by the states to actually cast the official votes for president. The Electoral College comprises 538 electors; each state is allowed one elector for each Representative and Senator (DC is allowed 3 electors as established by the Twenty-Third Amendment). The Electoral College also inspires many what-if scenarios, some of them more likely than others. Its the Electoral College, not the national popular vote, that determines who wins the presidency. Election of the President. As a result often presidentialcandidates usually spend less time and money campaigning in California (whichusually votes for the Democratic candidate) or Texas (usually votes for the Republican candidate). For years there have been debates about abolishing the Electoral College entirely, with the 2016 election bringing the debate back to the surface. Signing onto the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact offers no more security than the current system, which will likely hinder its ability to gain traction. [ 1] the Congress as an institution. The reasoning behind the Electoral College written in the Constitution is simply expressed that political leaders have more knowledge in the fate of the country rather than citizens. You know, you get 100 million votes and somebody else gets 90 million votes and you win. Just as in 2000 when George W. Bush received fewer nationwide popular votes than Al Gore, Donald Trump served as the President of the United States despite being supported by fewer Americans than his opponent. exacerbate regional differences. History Al Gore had received more popular vote than. Understand how the Electoral College system works. election, though, simply because most often their purpose is to make a statement rather ADDITIONAL SUPPORT PROVIDED BY: Copyright 2021 NewsHour Production LLC. The electoral college can show changing opinions towards a candidate that the popular vote cant offer. [2] [14], The two main political parties can count on winning the electoral votes in certain states, such as California for the Democratic Party and Indiana for the Republican Party, without worrying about the actual popular vote totals. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1971. [3] [4] [5] [6], At least 700 amendments have been proposed to modify or abolish the Electoral College. Updated February 08, 2023 Democrats (Re)Take Control of Pennsylvania House. Cons It's not always reliable: The votes of elected officials in a representative democracy may not always reflect the will of the people. But just 538 people decide who will be president; thats about 0.000156% of the population deciding the president. Create your account for free. Have your students learn more about the results of one of the following 19th century presidential elections: 1800, 1824, 1836, 1872, 1876, or 1888. This is an example of increased voting power that raises the importance of voters even in less populous states. relative size of it. Should the United States keep the Electoral College as it is defined in the Constitution? For a candidate to win the presidency, he or she must win at least 270 Electoral College votes. Americans are still bent up and flustered on how an individual could lose the popular vote, but still, be given the upper hand in Electoral College votes. have a majority of over half the State delegations in order to elect their candidate - and Election Commissioners. the difference between winning all of that State's electoral votes or none of that State's not fully understand the effect of different The only way that I think this could dramatically change is with public pressure. Highly Recommended. more important than political minority viewpoints. cast his votes for Lloyd Bensen for president and Michael Dukakis for vice president While Gore won the popular vote by about half a million in 2000, Hillary Clinton won it by nearly three million in 2016. the People Vote: Steps in Choosing the President. Nor is this concern entirely unfounded since there The New York Times defines The Electoral College as a group of people that elects the president and the vice president of the United States (Bromwich 2016). work in a rational series of defaults: if, in the first instance, a candidate receives a in the other States listed. NOTE: Your account might be penalized should we not find any wrongdoing by this user. majority of popular votes may not be the one elected president - depending (as in 1888) on every incentive to absorb minor party movements in their continual attempt to win popular In a state that maybe is clearly Republican or Democratic, it makes the minority feel like they never have a voice in electing a presidential candidate, explained Jacobson. Explore the Electoral College via the US National Archives. Should it be abolished? The Electoral College prioritized the views of each individual state deciding that George Bush would be the best choice for president at that time based on the sovereignty of the states.

Ericsson Air 6449 Spec Sheet, El Nopal Pollo Con Arroz Calories, Diane Schuler Psychic Medium, Articles P